Multiple Paths Toward Goals Can Motivate, then Derail Success

Szu-Chi Huang

Szu-Chi Huang

Goal motivation changes as people move closer to their target, according to Stanford’s Szu-chi Huang and Ying Zhang of University of Texas.
This finding confirms Heinz Heckhausen’s earlier studies of goal motivation.

Ying Zhang

Ying Zhang

In the first stages of effort toward a goal, multiple path makes the target seem attainable, noted Huang and Zhang.

Albert Bandura

Albert Bandura

This perception of “self-efficacy,” belief in ability to achieve a goal, provides motivation to continue goal striving, reported Stanford’s Albert Bandura.

Clark Hull

Clark Hull

When people are close to achieving a goal, a single goal path provides greater motivation.   
This observation is consistent with Clark Hull’s finding that motivation increases closer to the goal.

Sheena Iyengar

Sheena Iyengar

A single route to the finish reduces the “cognitive load” of considering different approaches, supporting Sheena Iyengar and Mark Lepper’s finding that “more choice is not always better.” 

Huang and Zhang also demonstrated the motivational impact of number of choices.
Volunteers with fewer choices were more likely to achieve the goal in a study of incentive to claim a reward.
“…relatively rigid structures can often simplify goal pursuit by removing the need to make choices,” explained Huang.

Peter Gollwitzer

Peter Gollwitzer

These stages of goal pursuit are characterized by different mindsets.
Deliberative Mindset” describes considering effort toward a goal whereas “Implemention Mindset” characterises planning actions toward a goal, according to NYU’s Peter Gollwitzer, Heinz Heckhausen, and Birgit Steller of University of Heidelberg.

Motivation toward a goal is also determined by:

  • Goal value,
  • Expectancy of success, based on probability, difficulty, sufficiency, necessity,
Nira Liberman

Nira Liberman

reported Tel Aviv Universitys Nira Liberman and Jens Förster of Jacobs University of Bremen and Universiteit van Amsterdam.

Jens Förster

Jens Förster

A practical application of these findings is that nonprofit organizations can increase fund-raising campaign participation and contributions by offering fewer and simpler contribution options when a fund-raising target is nearly met.

-*How do you maintain motivation when you are close to achieving a goal?

RELATED POSTS:

©Kathryn Welds

3 thoughts on “Multiple Paths Toward Goals Can Motivate, then Derail Success

  1. Rajesh Aundhe's avatarRajesh Aundhe

    Cognitive bias is observed in choosing the best way towards a goal , even if you need to choose from multiple ways .Working out a ‘prototype’ , mind mapping it, may reduce this . Multiple paths symbolize insecurity .Goals without defined timelines can have luxury of meandering thro multiple paths.

    Reply
    1. kathrynwelds's avatarkathrynwelds Post author

      Thanks for noting the importance of timelines linked to goals, Rajesh. Most of the research cited did not emphasize temporal milestones or “gates”. As you note, these are crucial to enable continued motivation and measurable progress toward business and personal goals.

      Reply
  2. Pingback: Paradox of Potential: May be More Appealing than Achievement in Job Search | Kathryn Welds | Curated Research and Commentary

Leave a reply to Rajesh Aundhe Cancel reply