William James, father of American psychology and brother of novelist Henry James wrote in his 1890 The Principles of Psychology, “Habit is thus the enormous flywheel of society, its most precious conservative agent. It alone is what keeps us all within the bounds of ordinance, and saves the children of fortune from the envious uprisings of the poor.”
Though James seemed to look favorably upon the conservative element of habit, the drawbacks of thoughtless habitual actions are clear when people consume more calories than required to complete daily activities, purchase unneeded items, react with predictable emotions in contentious situations, and keep disadvantaged groups without advantages enjoyed by powerful groups.
Charles Duhigg’s bestseller, The Power of Habit: Why We Do What We Do in Life and Business, argues that habits are a significant part of most people’s daily activities – about 40% – and that even brain injured people can form habits.
He outlines the A(ntecedant) – B(ehavior) – C(onsequence) model, initiated by a cue or a trigger that signals automatic or habitual behavior.
In a novel situation, the person shifts to a problem-solving mode to develop an appropriate response — which may require creative thinking .
However, in a more typical situation, the person executes the habitual physical, mental, or emotional behavior or “routine,” which is then rewarded — often with a reduction in anxiety or discomfort.
Duhigg shows how dysfunctional habits can be analyzed for the cue, routine, and reward, then changed by modifying the antecedent, behavior or reward.
The A-B-C approach was popularized by Albert Ellis in his Rational-Emotive Behavior Therapy (RET), and outlined in his more than 50 books including Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy
Duhigg provides examples from marketing campaigns for well-known consumer products in the U.S., including Pepsodent toothpaste and Febreze air freshener.
Like Duhigg’s model’s reference to earlier behavior modification approaches, Timothy Wilson of University of Virginia’s Redirect: The Surprising New Science of Psychological Change, adapts principles of Aaron T. Beck’s Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) to change habitual interpretations, attributions, narratives and personal stories that lead to social problems including alcohol and drug abuse, teen violence and pregnancies, and social prejudice.
Wilson extracts and renames three empirically-validated behavioral techniques:
- Story editing, to craft a more optimistic, hopeful story or interpretation about a situation, often using writing exercises
- Story prompting, in which another person provides alternate, more optimistic interpretations based on data or “social proof” from experiences in a similar situation
- Do good, be good, by “acting as if” the new behavior is a well-established habit, often through serving others in volunteer work.
Another look at habitual, even unconscious thinking in daily life is featured in a related post, Pattern Recognition in Entrepreneurship.
This discussion shares Douglas Van Praet’s guidelines to capitalize on unconscious cognitive processing and automatic buying behavior in Unconscious Branding: How Neuroscience Can Empower (and Inspire) Marketing
An earlier post, Hacking Human Behavior: “Tiny Habits” Start, Maintain Changes showcased BJ Fogg’s work on “tiny habits” as hooks to behavior change.
His approach draws on many of the same behavior modification principles featured in Duhigg’s and Wilson’s recommendations to analyze habitual cues, routines, and rewards.
-*How do you analyze and modify habits?
- Hacking Human Behavior: “Tiny Habits” Start, Maintain Changes
- Two Approaches to Following-Through on Plans, Adapting to Changes
- “Contemplative Neuroscience”: Transform your Mind, Change your Brain
- Creating Productive Thought Patterns, Challenging Destructive Thinking through “Thought Self-Leadership”
- Twitter: @kathrynwelds
- Blog: – Kathryn Welds | Curated Research and Commentary
- LinkedIn Open Group Brazen Careerist
- Facebook Notes ©Kathryn Welds
I think if you will check, Henry James was William James father. All of William James base thought came from reading E. Swedenborg; although, he wander greatly from Swedenborg’s true concepts.
Thanks for mentioning William James’s connection to Emanuel Swedenborg’s concepts. William James’s father, Henry James, introduced his sons, William and Henry Jr. (the novelist) to Swedenborg’s ideas. The Pacific School of Religion’s Swedenborgian House of Studies shares a letter from William James regarding his view of Swedenborg’s teachings: http://www.shs.psr.edu/studia/index.asp?article_id=201
Pingback: Evidence-Based Stress Management – Vitamins, Probiotics – Part 1 of 5 | Kathryn Welds | Curated Research and Commentary
Pingback: Evidence-Based Stress Management – Mindful Attention – Part 2 of 5 | Kathryn Welds | Curated Research and Commentary
Pingback: Evidence-Based Stress Management – Social Support – Part 3 of 5 | Kathryn Welds | Curated Research and Commentary
Pingback: Evidence-Based Stress Management – Music – Part 4 of 5 | Kathryn Welds | Curated Research and Commentary
Pingback: Evidence-Based Stress Management – Physical Exercise – Part 5 of 5 | Kathryn Welds | Curated Research and Commentary
Pingback: Mindfulness Impedes Implicit Learning, but May Enhance Explicit Learning | Kathryn Welds | Curated Research and Commentary
Pingback: Still Fulfilling Your New Year’s Resolutions? | Kathryn Welds | Curated Research and Commentary
Pingback: Multiple Paths Toward Goals Can Motivate, then Derail Success | Kathryn Welds | Curated Research and Commentary