Eminent physicist and everyone’s favorite genius, Albert Einstein, suggested that most people have a biased perception of time: “The distinction between past, present and future is an illusion, although a persistent one.”
More than half a century after Einstein’s groundbreaking theories of relativity a pioneering psychologist Rorschach expert Molly Harrower illustrated the emotional component of time perception in a poem she wrote during a time of personal transition and loss:
According to Einstein,
The faster we travel
The slower time passes
But the loneliness factor
By the time that Harrower published her The Therapy of Poetry in 1972, experimental psychologists from Wilhelm Wundt to Paul Fraisse and Kurt Lewin measured the psychophysics of time perceptions.
Stanford’s Philip Zimbardo with John Boyd extended this work to demonstrate how time perspective – whether past, present or future and tinged with negative or positive emotion – is related to differences in school completion, health behaviors including smoking, drinking, drug use, contraception and driving, coping with homelessness and job search.
Zimbardo became well-known following the disturbing results of the Stanford Prison Experiment, and later began investigating subjective Time Perspective (TP) using a self-report inventory
They identified six time perspectives:
- Positive Past
- Negative Past
- Hedonistic Present
- Fatalist Present
- Transcendental Future
Zimbardo and Boyd suggested an optimal orientation to time includes a calibrated perspective across the six time orientations.
Citing his own childhood in the South Bronx, Zimbardo argued that schools convert Present Hedonists into Future-oriented time perceivers, and increase opportunities for economic advancement.
Robert Levine of California State University, Fresno, differentiated among measured time and subjective time by defining:
- Clock time
- Event time
- Natural time
He asked how people use time in different regions, and the impact of these choices on relationships and health.
Like Zimbardo and Boyd, he advocates developing the ability to move across time orientations and time-related behaviors.
Some of these time perspectives can include subjective biases, including an “elastic” experience of time – sometimes shorter or longer than clock time, according to the BBC’s Claudia Hammond.
She identified several biases in time perception, such as overestimating elapsed time during a frightening experience and shortening of perceived time during a pleasant experience or as one ages.
One explanation for the feeling like time accelerates as one gets older is the “proportionality theory“, according to University of Groningen’s Douwe Draaisma.
In this view, a year – 365 days most years – can feel brief when one is 40 years old and has already lived almost 14,600 days.
The same year might feel longer to an 8 year old who had lived almost 2920 days, because it is a larger proportion of experienced time.
Another time perception bias is “forward telescoping,” the feeling that past events occurred more recently than they actually did, according to Lehman College’s Vincent Prohaska with colleagues Norman Brown and Robert Belli.
“Reverse telescoping” refers to past events of the same elapsed time that seem to have taken place even longer ago.
The Holiday Paradox is another time perception anomaly in which time away from one’s usual routine feeling like it passed both quickly and occurred over a long period of time, perhaps due to the concentration of new experiences and the need to concentrate on processing novel information.
Similarly, “Reminiscence Bump” enables many people to recall experiences between 15 and 25, including prominent news events and cultural trends including music, attire, interests.
University of Chicago’s Norman Bradburn suggested that these distortions may occur because many experiences during memorable or “critical” developmental periods are usually novel, distinctive, personally-involving, and emotionally-tinged.
Because these events were memorable, they may seem to have occurred more recently because people often associate clearer memories with more recent occurrences.
This “inner chronometry” of time tracking can be distorted by emotions, attention, expectations, task demands, and even ambient temperature, according to “the Clarity Hypothesis” to explain these perceptual biases.
-*How do you mitigate time biases?
-*How have you seen these time biases affect and relate to other areas of life?
- When Women Predominate in Groups – Stigma Contagion
- Reduce “Affective Forecasting” Errors with a Geographic Cure?
- Biases in Unconscious Automatic Mental Processing, and “Work-Arounds”
- Overcoming Decision Bias: Allure of “Availability Heuristic”, “Primacy Effect”
- Human Decision Biases Modeled with Automatons
- Detect and Mitigate Decision Biases
- Hypothetical Questions May Lead to Bias
- Consider All Your Options at Once, Be Happier with Choices: Minimize “Quest for the Best” Bias
- Useful Fiction: Optimism Bias of Positive Illusions
- Reduce Evaluator Bias: Showcase Best Features in Any Offer
- Hiring by Cultural Matching: Potential for Bias
- Decision Maximizers, Satisficers and Potential Bias
Blog: – Kathryn Welds | Curated Research and Commentary
LinkedIn Open Group Psychology in Human Resources (Organisational Psychology)
Reblogged this on Poch Peralta.
Pingback: What IS Time? | ADD . . . and-so-much-more
Pingback: Unlocking the Mysteries of Time: Why Time Slows Down When We’re Afraid, Speeds Up as We Age, and Gets Warped on Vacation | boldcorsicanflame's Blog
Pingback: How the Brain Perceives Time So You Can Manage Time Demands, not Time | Kathryn Welds | Curated Research and Commentary
Pingback: Watching Yourself in the Mirror – Illusions and Therapies | Kathryn Welds | Curated Research and Commentary
Pingback: Still Fulfilling Your New Year’s Resolutions? | Kathryn Welds | Curated Research and Commentary