Experimental psychologist, Elizabeth Loftus investigated memory and its quirks, such as mistaken eyewitness testimony and “repressed memory” of pedophilia in laboratory and naturalistic settings for nearly 40 years.
William Saletan of Slate replicated one of Loftus’s experiments in memory insertion by using digitally-altered photos by developing five images of events that did not actually occur:
- Sen. Joe Lieberman voting to convict President Clinton at his impeachment trial
- Vice President Cheney rebuking Sen. John Edwards in their debate for mentioning Cheney’s lesbian daughter
- President Bush relaxing at his ranch with Roger Clemens during Hurricane Katrina
- Hillary Clinton using Jeremiah Wright in a 2008 TV ad
- President Obama shaking hands with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
These images were mixed with photos of actual events:
- 2000 Presidential election recount in Florida
- Colin Powell’s prewar assessment of Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction
- 2005 congressional vote to intervene in the Terri Schiavo’s “right-to-die” case.
Each participant viewed three true incidents and one randomly selected fake incident, and was asked whether the subject remembered each one.
Next, each volunteer was informed that one of the incidents was false and was asked select the fake.
Slate’s results replicated the trend observed by Loftus: Fewer than half of the volunteers correctly detected fake photos and many “misremembered” fake photos by giving detailed explanations of their recollections of events that did not actually occur and photos that did not exist before the experiment.
The findings validate psychologist Frederic Bartlett’s claim wrote almost a century ago at Cambridge University:
Remembering is not the re-excitation of innumerable fixed, lifeless and fragmentary traces.
It is an imaginative reconstruction, or construction, built out of the relation of our attitude towards a whole active mass of organized past reactions or experience.
More recently, sleep researcher Rosalind Cartwright summarized Bartlett’s point by concluding that “Memory is never a precise duplicate of the original… it is a continuing act of creation,” and artist Austin Kleon translated these concepts into current vernacular: “you are a mash-up of what you let into your life.”
British psychotherapist Philippa Perry points to the logical conclusion from these observations in advising, “Be careful which stories you expose yourself to. … The meanings you find, and the stories you hear, will have an impact on how optimistic you are…”
-*How do you monitor the accuracy of your memories?
-*How do you detect “memory mash-ups”?
-*How do you select the experiences from which you form memories?
Related Posts:
- Kept Up at Night by Intrusive Thoughts of Work: Elusive Sleep
- Online Brain Training For Attention, Memory, Processing Speed, Interpersonal Skills
- Human Decision Biases Modeled with Automatons
- Biases in Unconscious Automatic Mental Processing, and “Work-Arounds”
- Hypothetical Questions May Lead to Bias
- Detect and Mitigate Decision Biases
- Overcoming Decision Bias: Allure of “Availability Heuristic”, “Primacy Effect”
Twitter: @kathrynwelds
Google+
Blog: – Kathryn Welds | Curated Research and Commentary
LinkedIn Open Group Diversity
Facebook Notes:
©Kathryn Welds
Pingback: Neuronal Recordings Suggest “Free Will” Might be “Free Won’t” | Kathryn Welds | Curated Research and Commentary
Pingback: Want to Remember Something You Read? Skip the Underlining – Exploding Learning Technique Myths | Kathryn Welds | Curated Research and Commentary
Pingback: An End to “Death by PowerPoint”: Neuroimaging Studies Improve Visual Display Design | Kathryn Welds | Curated Research and Commentary
Pingback: Transference in Everyday Life Biases Memory, Emotions | Kathryn Welds | Curated Research and Commentary
Pingback: Emotional Music Can Lead to Biased Judgments | Kathryn Welds | Curated Research and Commentary